The History of Scientology starts 1901 in the written word of human history. The Book the word by Allen Upward. This part of the Scientology History.
Definitions of new words is important
“All this is not really science, but only Scientology. It is language. It is the magic lullaby in which the shapes of things melt and reshape them-self forever.”
Scientology The New Word
It is not really science, but only scientology. It is the magic lullaby in which the shapes of things melt and reshape themself forever. Sounds that the author finding a new word to express what a dream is in meandering tale.
All this is not really science, but only Scientology.
It is language. It is the magic lullaby in which the
shapes of things melt and reshape themselves forever.
And so, when we would try to stop that wheel
we call the mind, and look between the spokes, at
once the All-Thing in its turn begins to spin about
us, and all which it contains to slide and glide away :
as in that wondrous story of creation handed down
from Finnish sorcerers of old, when the wizard Lemminkainen
comes into the hall and sings ; and while
he sings the swords vanish out of the hands of the
fcasters, and the cups vanish from their lips, and
the tables and the walls melt and fade, and lastly
the hall itself and all within it melt and fade away,
and only the magic song goes on.
times carelessly calls atoms, the author of the Story
of Creation Says in his sternest Athanasian Vein,—
‘ Since the present universe had its beginning the
elements have undergone no change.” In some past
universe, perhaps, they were less stubborn. In the
meanwhile, of course, they are outside the Theory
of Evolution, although my teacher omits to note
Of the atom, its modern discoverer, Dalton, proudly
declared,—” NO man can split an atom ; ” or, in other
words, no man can split the unsplitable. The emin-
ent Huxley no less rashly boasted,—” The atom is truly
an immortal being.” My author, with a difference
as welcome as it is unexpected, contents himself
with saying that the atoms have not yet been split.
And even that is not true.
I find there are at least three atoms known to
science, or at least to scientology, the arithmetical
atom, the physical one, and the logical one. Of
these the logical one has been kept intact by un-
heard of efforts ; the other two have been split, and
are being split every day.
The first, or chemical atom, is no more than an
arithmetical term, in short it is an item. The chemist
has found that when his elements unite with each
other they do so always in fixed proportions, and
it is the proportion which he is thinking of when
he uses the word atom. Thus when he wants to
say that in every gallon of water, or steam, there
are two pints of hydrogen for one pint of Oxygen,
he puts it ” atom ” of hydrogen is H2. In
hydrochloric acid this atom splits, and we get HI
Scientology The demon in the stone
The Demon in the Stone 135
If that be so, how did the demon get into the stone ?
Here is the riddle they have got to read. Once
upon a time a demon used to enter into the stone
while it was falling through the air, and the name
of that demon was Momentum, which is to say,
being interpreted, Rush. In these days that demon
of the air has been exorcised, but only to make room
for a far more subtle fiend, the Demon of the House-
Roof. This demon does not wait till the stone begins
to fall ; no, he was there all the time lurking inside
it, while it was lying there so quietly and peacefully
among the Christian tiles. Then how did this demon
get into the stone ?
There stands the riddle, and the learned men think
that they have read it, as they think they have read
other riddles, by muttering something that sounds
uncommonly like hie haec hoc.
But they have not told us how the demon got into
The one sound example of Energy of Position,
the one case in which the words are not wholly meaningless,
is that of the scale in which you balance
a pound of meat by an ounce weight at the end of
a lever. And as soon as we utter the word lever,
lo ! the Energetic demon is conjured back into the
Ethereal dustbin. We are talking, not metaphysics,
but mechanics, and measuring the ways of strength
instead of pretending to account for them. The
strength with which a falling stone strikes the ground
is its weight, multiplied by the height from which
it fell. So much we know, the rest is ta meta ta
phusika and hie haec hoc.
The Man in the Crumb
would be right. Science is determined not to give
him the chance, and in order to blind him, and be-
wilder him, she has taken the dead cipher whose right
name is Speed, and dressed it up in an old suit of
clothes, and clapped on it a turnip’s head, and an
old hat, and stuck a candle inside it, and called it
Energy of Motion.
The Kinetic Molecular Theory is the view that
crumbs have souls.
The Going Crumb View, with its straight lines,
which are curves ; its crumbs which are images
formed in the mind out of real crumbs and arith-
metical ciphers; its Andronican elasticity, its man-
faced energy of motion, and its double-faced veloci-
ties ; all brought together to account for a not-quite-
true law ; is a fair sample, taken at haphazardi of
scientological writing. It is no whit better than
theological writing. And unhappily scientology is as
often mistaken for science as theology is for worship.
Since it was for young Cameron’s sake that I had
wrestled with this knot of words I mode the experi-
ment of reading over my notes to a grown-up Cameron.
I read them to a young man of naturally thought-
ful mind, Who had taken lessons in physical science,
which I have never been fortunate enough to do, and
THE CONJURING TRICK
The Idealist Lexicon.—l. The Coniurer of Alexan-
dria.—2. Pure Assurance.—3. The Child’ s Riddle.—
4. The Enchanled Castle.—5. A Work of an Idealist
DESCARTES likened his search for some one cer-
tain truth on which to build, to the demand
of Archimedes for a fulcrum on which to swing tho
earth. I seek to tell what manner of book is worth a
bag of gold, and what I need is one firm word that Will
not change into some other word, and slide and glide
We have now dealt with the Idealism that looks
within, and the Materialism that looks without, it—
self. In both cases our quarrel was with words ; but
whereas Idealism was all words, we quarrelled with
it altogether ; and whereag Materialism was a mix-
ture of facts and words, we had. no quarrel with
its facts. We distinguished between science and
Such differential treatment accords with the spirit
of the Will we are construing, in which there are
three bequests to science. If the Testator’s idealism.
The one pictured in the images above is from 1908 with the values of added comments and some reviews.
The History of Scientology starts 1901 in the written word of human history. The Book the word by Allen Upward. This part of the Scientology History. The new Word first came out anonymously in 1901 and later on by different publisher. The one pictured in the images above is from 1908 with the values of added comments and some reviews.
An Open Letter
addressed to the Swedish Academy in Stockholm
on the meaning of the word
Scientology History New Word Upward
The word Scientology today is not really mirrored in Idealist by the way. These later L Ron Hubbard Scientology now by the leader David Miscavige rather seems to have been characterized as an Cult of Greed, aiming to silence any critics.
Scientology the Cult of Greed